could be sued for damages. The court reasoned that judges were immune only from suits concerning actions taken within their authorized juris- diction. And when judges act far beyond their authority, or outside of their jurisdiction, they are to be treated as or- dinary citizens would be treated, with no immunity from lawsuits.

At last, it looked as though Linda Sparkman would receive some compensation, if only monetary, for the right that was taken away from her. But, then, Judge Harold Stump appealed the court of appeal’s decision to the United States Supreme Court. The State of Indiana filed a brief in support of Judge Stump, arguing that judges must have absolute immunity, so that they will act without fear of re- taliation.

A little fear would have been good for Judge Stump. Maybe he wouldn&r...

Please subscribe to keep reading.